<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>C on A Nickel&#39;s Worth</title>
    <link>/tags/c/</link>
    <description>Recent content in C on A Nickel&#39;s Worth</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/c/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Losing Big Is Easy</title>
      <link>/posts/losing-big-is-easy/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/losing-big-is-easy/</guid>
      <description>What&amp;rsquo;s the connection between soda and the failure of programming languages? I would have thought &amp;ldquo;zero&amp;rdquo; had I not recently stumbled across a wikipedia article about a little-known predecessor of Coca-Cola. As it turns out, in 1879, a scrappy Norwegian immigrant named Jan Kjarti (who, incidentally, also coined the term &amp;ldquo;artificial sweetener&amp;rdquo;) started a soda company. His company, Slug Cola (the motto was &amp;ldquo;you&amp;rsquo;ll love to Slug it down!&amp;rdquo;), produced a soda that cost a little more than Coke but which actually tasted much better (note that it didn&amp;rsquo;t actually use artificial sweetener, either).</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
